Warden J. Fikes gave rejection notices in April to senior prisoners who had filed for compassionate release on the grounds that the prison could not possibly keep them safe from the COVID-19 virus. The prison, F.C.I. Sandstone, is considered a “low risk” institution and costs taxpayers millions to house mostly middle aged prisoners who are unlikely to re-offend.
The overcrowded prison houses 162 inmates per unit in just 30 feet by 90 feet of space, where inmates must share sinks and showers and are forced to double bunk in 6-by-9-foot cubes. The living conditions are abysmal, with open cubes and inmates not required to wear masks while in their cube. That means the entire population is vulnerable to getting the disease quickly. Hand sanitizer and masks are not available for purchase to inmates, and sickness and disease are rampant in the units. Nurses will just tell inmates to “sleep it off.”
As the looming threat posed by the COVID-19 pandemic increases, inmate families are feeling increased anxiety as well, especially for those with preexisting conditions or those not in the best health due to drug or alcohol abuse. Sandstone doesn’t seem to have an adequate plan for tackling the coronavirus threat. If the prison was infected, inmates would not be able to social distance. It would be an explosive infection of the transmission of the disease, risking the lives of vulnerable populations inside.
What is most disturbing, though, is that the decision not to send seniors home in this environment seems to be based on a “human dollar sign” and not a concern for the safety of the community. F.C.I. Sandstone receives taxpayer money per inmate and with an estimated 1,400 inmates currently housed here, the facility receives millions in funds. Losing inmates means losing money.
But humans are not dollar signs, and filling beds by a prison enterprise is not more important than human life.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Here are our ground rules:
- You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
- No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
- No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
- No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
- No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
- Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
- If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
- If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
- Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.