Dogs have been in the Jefferson City Correctional Center (JCCC) in Jefferson City Missouri since before I arrived here in 2011. The first housing unit I was assigned to was Housing Unit Four, proud home of the JCCC dog program!

I have had a firsthand view of the order of operations, as it pertains to these animals. When the dogs are brought into the institution, the priority of the staff and administration is to get the dogs adoption (parole) ready, as soon as possible.

A mental assessment is done on the animals and then a personal trainer is assigned to the dog. The personal trainer is already familiar with the dogs’ individual needs and mental assessment. If that isn’t enough, a representative from the animal shelter enters the institution weekly, to check up on the animals’ progress and give further guidance and assistance to those who are preparing the dogs for adoption.

Rehabilitation is mandated for the animals, as they are put through rigorous training in order to make them “adoption ready.” Each and every issue the animal has, whether it be health or social, is assessed and addressed. The dogs are essentially given one option, and that is to change or return to the shelter to be euthanized.

It’s truly unfortunate that the same time and energy isn’t put into rehabilitation of the men and women who are confined with the Missouri Department of Corrections. Recidivism is an ever present reality, because there is no requirement to change. There is no mandate to address the issues that birthed the criminal inclination or actions.

There are no staff members on stand-by checking upon your parole readiness. No one. In fact, one would almost be correct in saying that everyone who works at this institution stands in direct opposition to our freedom and our dreams. The staff are more concerned with the rehabilitation of dogs than they are of the men and women prisoners throughout the U.S.’s ever-expanding prison system, simply warehoused, while true animals are being prepared for release.

If those who are in positions of power and influence within the Missouri Department of Corrections truly believed that locking up the physical would change the mental, why would they continue to invest so much time, energy and money into the rehabilitation of actual animals, more than they do in the rehabilitation of the men and women incarcerated in Missouri?

Close window X

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Prison Journalism Project is happy to share our writers and reporters’ stories with your print and online audiences. You are free to republish them under a Creative Commons license unless otherwise noted on the page. You can use the URL or copy and paste the story into your CMS.

Here are our ground rules:

• You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
• No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
• No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
• No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
• No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
• No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
• No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
• Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
• If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
• If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
• Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.

Puppies for Parole. What About People for Parole?

by Patricia Elane Trimble, Prison Journalism Project
September 1, 2020

<h1>Puppies for Parole. What About People for Parole?</h1> <p class="byline">by Patricia Elane Trimble, Prison Journalism Project <br />September 1, 2020</p> <p>Dogs have been in the Jefferson City Correctional Center (JCCC) in Jefferson City Missouri since before I arrived here in 2011. The first housing unit I was assigned to was Housing Unit Four, proud home of the JCCC dog program!</p> <p>I have had a firsthand view of the order of operations, as it pertains to these animals. When the dogs are brought into the institution, the priority of the staff and administration is to get the dogs adoption (parole) ready, as soon as possible.</p> <p>A mental assessment is done on the animals and then a personal trainer is assigned to the dog. The personal trainer is already familiar with the dogs’ individual needs and mental assessment. If that isn’t enough, a representative from the animal shelter enters the institution weekly, to check up on the animals’ progress and give further guidance and assistance to those who are preparing the dogs for adoption.</p> <p>Rehabilitation is mandated for the animals, as they are put through rigorous training in order to make them “adoption ready.” Each and every issue the animal has, whether it be health or social, is assessed and addressed. The dogs are essentially given one option, and that is to change or return to the shelter to be euthanized.</p> <p>It’s truly unfortunate that the same time and energy isn’t put into rehabilitation of the men and women who are confined with the Missouri Department of Corrections. Recidivism is an ever present reality, because there is no requirement to change. There is no mandate to address the issues that birthed the criminal inclination or actions.</p> <p>There are no staff members on stand-by checking upon your parole readiness. No one. In fact, one would almost be correct in saying that everyone who works at this institution stands in direct opposition to our freedom and our dreams. The staff are more concerned with the rehabilitation of dogs than they are of the men and women prisoners throughout the U.S.’s ever-expanding prison system, simply warehoused, while true animals are being prepared for release.</p> <p>If those who are in positions of power and influence within the Missouri Department of Corrections truly believed that locking up the physical would change the mental, why would they continue to invest so much time, energy and money into the rehabilitation of actual animals, more than they do in the rehabilitation of the men and women incarcerated in Missouri?</p> <p>This <a target="_blank" href="https://prisonjournalismproject.org/2020/09/01/puppies-for-parole/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://prisonjournalismproject.org">Prison Journalism Project</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://i0.wp.com/prisonjournalismproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/cropped-PJP-favicon-2.png?fit=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;"><img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://prisonjournalismproject.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=344&ga=" style="width:1px;height:1px;"></p>

1