I entered the prison system almost 17 years ago, and as I’m ready to leave it, I’m ironically hit with the same feelings I had at the beginning of my term — frustration. This frustration is somewhat different though, in that instead of being locked down for the war of prison politics, we’re now slammed with a virus that has much of the same inconsiderate tone.
In 2005, I was 23 years old and placed on the level four yard at Salinas Valley State Prison, which was one of the most dangerous prisons at the time. Assaults and stabbings occurred frequently. But the comparison between then and now is not in the violence that took place, but in the program that corrections officers structured around that type of environment. Back then, the prison system strived on violence. Officers were paid double for hazard pay, did very little work, and ran few programs. Phones, visits and basic necessities were limited to almost nothing for months, even a year.
Reform was practically non-existent and lockdown was the priority.
Since then, a lot of changes have been made by inmates and those working on internal reform from the community, to whom we owe much gratitude.
The COVID-19 program containment policy seems more of the same lockdown structure of the past. I was recently rehoused in a containment building in an active yard.
One day prior to the end of the 14-day quarantine, we were transported in a small, dirty van, packed in ten at a time, and taken to a building that had no porters to clean. We were given no cleaning supplies even when we asked for them. No one cleaned the showers, and there were only two overworked staff members. This, to me, was dumbfounding. There was also much movement from yard to yard; prisoners were escorted in and out of their cells daily. Sometimes, my defective door would pop open, which was a terrible feeling.
This is about half of the frustration I’ve felt this year. Some staff have used COVID-19 to overlook the things we were allowed during this time. Phones, showers, yard, visits have all been delayed, neglected or just denied. It is unclear whether this was due to laziness, unwillingness, disregard or straight disrespect for inmates.
According to my observation of other yards of similar levels, the Sensitive Needs Yards (SNYs) have had programs much more frequently during this time frame. This yard is not alone, either. Anyone who has made the recent transition from an active yard to an SNY will verify this truth.
Given the structure of the gangs on the active yards, this is no surprise. What is surprising is that out of the last two prisons I’ve been in, there was less violence, and more inmates were making changes and giving back, myself included. Yet we were given less and treated with less respect. This says a lot about the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s underlying policies.
We feel out of touch, out of personal control, unheard, and taken advantage of in our quest to make changes and give back to others. This creates anger that most of us don’t want to live with any more. Of course our struggles are not even close to the struggles of those out on the streets, but they aren’t comfortable either. We have lost family, miss the families we used to see, and hate being slammed 24/7. This gives rise to new resentments as we are demeaned, disregarded, and disrespected.
This isn’t saying all staff are created equal or that all police diminish our welfare. However, it is far from equal, and the structure is so antiquated that I’ll be paroling with the same lock ’em down and move ’em around policy as I came in with. I may be leaving, but my heart is still with those who have to continue living with these frustrations. I pray they keep striving anyway.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Here are our ground rules:
- You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
- No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
- No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
- No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
- No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
- Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
- If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
- If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
- Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.