Most of the 150 men in my building have been following the George Floyd killing.
From the time I first learned of the case, I believed Derek Chauvin would be convicted, but only of manslaughter. As more details emerged in the newspaper and during the trial, I knew he would and should be convicted of murder. I had little doubt that the jury would agree.
My roommate Justin agreed. “I believed he would be found guilty from the beginning,” he said. “Without the video or if George Floyd had not died, he would have gotten away with only a slap on the wrist.” Justin has a military background, and is a White, 47-year-old from Texas.
Dortel, who is Black, in his late 40s and has a Ph.D. also said he had confidence in the jury. His roommate Antwane, a 33-year old Black Jehovah’s Witness, believed Chauvin would be convicted but thought that he would be released early from his sentence.
Isaac, a 33-year-old Mexican who works as a dog trainer in the “Paws for Life” program, said he had assumed Chauvin would be found not guilty because of what he has seen in previous trials involving police officers. He was surprised and happy and thought a 25-year sentence was appropriate.
Robert, who is Chinese in his mid-40s and working on his MBA, wasn’t very interested in the case, saying that he was more concerned about prison problems and getting his sentence commuted.
Sonny, a 45-year-old Vietnamese man, expected that Chauvin would be made into an example, with a guilty verdict to serve as a warning to other police officers.
Joshua, a 44-year old Chinese Buddhist, also had no doubt from the beginning that he would be found guilty and thought Chauvin should be sentenced to the maximum term. Ken, a 52-year old Japanese man, said that the testimony during the trial, specifically the comments made by the medical personnel, made him realize George Floyd’s death was murder.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Here are our ground rules:
- You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
- No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
- No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
- No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
- No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
- Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
- If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
- If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
- Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.
Reactions to Chauvin Inside of a Los Angeles Prison
