The number of different social movements over the last 10 years have brought forth a lot of significant change. Many members of the elite have been held accountable for their wrongdoings. In the beginning, I applauded the snatching open of closet doors, dragging the bogeymen out into the light.
But it also made me think more deeply about how it can harm freedom of speech. What does this new awakening actually accomplish? Can I no longer express my true opinion or beliefs without having to worry about whether or not it is socially acceptable today? Am I the only one who anticipates the danger of this current movement?
The problem is that current movements do not necessarily hold the right people accountable. If one takes a deep dive into the history of oppression in this country, there are many other individuals who should be held accountable for atrocities against socially-marginalized groups but have continued to profit from these horrific acts.
Prisons are a good example of what happens when individuals are held accountable indefinitely and mercilessly without a chance to redeem themselves. We prisoners live by their past whether they like it or not. As a person in prison, everything I’ve done in my entire life is constantly subject to scrutiny. Prison officials use my history to decide who I am today. Something I said 30 years ago could derail my chance of parole today.
The Board of Parole Hearings (BPH), made up of commissioners who are appointed by the governor of California, are endowed with the authority to decide whether to release someone after they have served a certain amount of time. Usually, the people who appear before the BPH have received a life sentence with a certain number of years they must serve. Typically, that’s 15 to 25 years. In my case, it was two 30-year-to-life sentences under California’s three-strikes law.
On multiple occasions, these commissioners have denied people freedom because of an act or a comment they made more than 20 years earlier, unrelated to the reason for incarceration. The individual is damned if they do not attempt to defend their actions and damned if they don’t. Ultimately, it gives the BPH another reason to deny someone’s request for parole.
This is not to say that people should not be held accountable, but we should be more cautious about how we approach that accountability. The way social media has ousted people does not seem like an effective way to create social change, rather it feels more like the act of a bully.
As we venture further into these social movements, proclaiming a new era of tolerance and acceptance, we must be vigilant and mindful that many atrocities in our past history are more deeply rooted and systemic than past comments made by individuals.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Here are our ground rules:
- You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
- No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
- No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
- No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
- No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
- Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
- If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
- If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
- Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.