It is sad that women in the United States required a law to protect their right to do something with their own bodies in the first place. Now that same venerable law, which gave us the freedom to make those decisions, is taking that freedom away? 

What’s next?

For decades, we have been fighting for equality in this patriarchal country: Equal pay and the right to vote are just a couple of struggles that come to mind. We deal with more assault and abuse from men than they deal with from women, and there aren’t enough protections or laws to keep us safe. 

Then there is the question about men: What law governs them and their bodies that, at any moment, can be reversed, depriving them of autonomy? 

None. 

Look at where our country is regarding gun laws. More men buy guns, use guns and hunt than women. God forbid they take away the right for men to bear arms.

It didn’t take long to reverse a 50-year-old decision regarding a topic premised on when the act becomes murder. But when guns unequivocally kill people? One has to wonder if this reversal is a diversion from the real murder problem in our country. 

The U.S. is officially moving backward: White cops killing Black men like we are living in the times of slavery; electing Putin’s friend Donald Trump to the presidency; and now fighting for the right to govern our own bodies … again. 

Men’s voices are rarely, if ever, taken away. If anything, they are heard louder when they have an issue. But us women? We have to organize and cultivate whole movements — like #MeToo — just to be heard. 

How many women were a part of the initial discussion to reverse Roe v. Wade? How many of their voices versus men’s were a part of the ultimate decision? 

Understand that this is not about what type of abortion is considered murder, or when an abortion is considered murder, or not giving an unborn child a chance at life. 

This is about a woman, in the so-called land of the free, having the right to do with her body as she chooses. 

What will they take from us next?

Close window X

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Prison Journalism Project is happy to share our writers and reporters’ stories with your print and online audiences. You are free to republish them under a Creative Commons license unless otherwise noted on the page. You can use the URL or copy and paste the story into your CMS.

Here are our ground rules:

• You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
• No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
• No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
• No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
• No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
• No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
• No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
• Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
• If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
• If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
• Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.

After Roe, What Will They Take From Us Next?

by Natasha White, Prison Journalism Project
July 1, 2022

<h1>After Roe, What Will They Take From Us Next?</h1> <p class="byline">by Natasha White, Prison Journalism Project <br />July 1, 2022</p> <p>It is sad that women in the United States required a law to protect their right to do something with their own bodies in the first place. Now that same venerable law, which gave us the freedom to make those decisions, is taking that freedom away?&nbsp;</p> <p>What's next?</p> <p>For decades, we have been fighting for equality in this patriarchal country: Equal pay and the right to vote are just a couple of struggles that come to mind. We deal with more assault and abuse from men than they deal with from women, and there aren't enough protections or laws to keep us safe.&nbsp;</p> <p>Then there is the question about men: What law governs them and their bodies that, at any moment, can be reversed, depriving them of autonomy? </p> <p>None.&nbsp;</p> <p>Look at where our country is regarding gun laws. More <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">men buy guns, use guns and hunt than women</a>. God forbid they take away the right for men to bear arms.</p> <p>It didn’t take long to reverse a 50-year-old decision regarding a topic premised on when the act becomes murder. But when guns unequivocally kill people? One has to wonder if this reversal is a diversion from the real murder problem in our country.&nbsp;</p> <p>The U.S. is officially moving backward: White cops killing Black men like we are living in the times of slavery; electing Putin’s friend Donald Trump to the presidency; and now fighting for the right to govern our own bodies … again. </p> <p>Men's voices are rarely, if ever, taken away. If anything, they are heard louder when they have an issue. But us women? We have to organize and cultivate whole movements — like #MeToo — just to be heard.&nbsp;</p> <p>How many women were a part of the initial discussion to reverse Roe v. Wade? How many of their voices versus men’s were a part of the ultimate decision?&nbsp;</p> <p>Understand that this is not about what type of abortion is considered murder, or when an abortion is considered murder, or not giving an unborn child a chance at life.&nbsp;</p> <p>This is about a woman, in the so-called land of the free, having the right to do with her body as she chooses.&nbsp;</p> <p>What will they take from us next?</p> <p>This <a target="_blank" href="https://prisonjournalismproject.org/2022/07/01/after-roe-v-wade-america-moves-backward/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://prisonjournalismproject.org">Prison Journalism Project</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://i0.wp.com/prisonjournalismproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/cropped-PJP-favicon-2.png?fit=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;"><img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="https://prisonjournalismproject.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=19745&ga=" style="width:1px;height:1px;"></p>

1