Living in a 100-year-old prison with open-bar cell fronts and extremely poor ventilation is hard enough in normal times. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, incarcerated individuals, especially those with underlying health conditions, have been forced to take their health and safety into their own hands.
It hasn’t worked out well for everyone.
John James has been incarcerated in Washington state for 26 years and has spent the last two years at Monroe Correctional Complex (MCC). He is a devout Muslim, husband and the father of four children. He suffers from a variety of health issues including Crohn’s disease, which requires infusions of Remicade at a medical center in the community, outside of the prison complex. However, these treatments compromise his immune system, leaving him at tremendous risk of contracting the virus, which could be deadly if he were infected. And in the latest outbreak at MCC, he is one of the prisoners who has tested positive.
At the beginning of the pandemic, James was working in a shop rebuilding used wheelchairs which are donated to communities that suffer from devastating levels of poverty. This is a program many prisoners take great pride in because it allows them to give back to society while they are serving time. In the shop, excess material that cannot be used in refurbishing the wheelchairs is often thrown away. James has used some of these discarded scraps to create masks to protect himself from COVID-19. He was not the only prisoner to do this, but he was the only prisoner reported to prison staff by another incarcerated worker. This information led James to be fired from the shop and given three “major infractions.” Until that time, he had not had a “major infraction” in 12 years.
The infractions claimed James had stolen hundreds of dollars in material, yet the search of his cell only turned up a small handful of hand-made masks and pouches; clearly not worth hundreds of dollars. Additionally, the infraction report dramatically claimed, “We [were] unable to complete wheelchairs due to the shortage of material from offender James’ theft.” There is no way this is a true statement.
The guard writing the report included exaggerations and lies, including an accusation that James had “massive” amounts of food in his cell, using this to bolster a claim that he was trading stolen goods, or the masks he made from them, for food (for which he actually had receipts).
The hearing officer’s decision concluded the true value of the material was unknown and never mentioned the false claims of trading masks or materials for profit.
Another infraction accused James of possessing clothing or assigned equipment of a staff member. This claim derived from protective gear he was given on a recent medical transport trip by an EMT to protect himself while on his way to treatment at the outside medical facility.
When it came time for James to attend the disciplinary hearing, he thought he would be released from the major infractions. To his surprise, the hearing was nothing more than a staged procedure. He was denied witnesses and promptly found guilty on two of the three charges; one was reduced from a major infraction to a minor infraction.
Hoping for better luck on appeal, James was again met with disappointment. In the appeal, he informed the appeal’s officer of clear procedural violations that disregarded his due process rights during his original infraction hearing, violations that should have resulted in the dismissal of his infractions, but the decision was upheld.
In his own words, James told me he felt targeted, that he was the only prisoner to suffer such harsh consequences. “I was not the only one making masks to protect myself, so it’s hard to not think I may have been singled-out because I am a Black, Native, Muslim man.”
The more James tried to plead his case, the more he became a target for the state Department of Corrections.
James has been caught up in an appeal process that has lasted for months and resulted in countless punishments including: the loss of his job, earned good time (15 days), the loss of privileges (30 days) which consists of the ability to order from the commissary and the use of all personal property (such as a fan, cup, bowl, TV, etc). The sanctions just continue to be piled on.
And now, James has tested positive for COVID-19 along with 115 other prisoners on his unit. He is currently in what is called “medical isolation,” but what is actually a cell meant to house a single person when they are put on the Intensive Management Unit (commonly called, “solitary confinement”), except he is in the cell with another COVID-19 positive prisoner. One of them sleeps on the floor with their head near the toilet.
James has been helpless, frustrated and angry for months. Now, with an underlying condition that compromises his immune system, he is in grave danger. He and his family have spent too much time and energy fighting the whole process; time and energy that should have been spent protecting him from contracting a virus that could threaten his life.
James will now be forced to spend more time incarcerated and away from his family for doing nothing more than trying to protect himself while being an incarcerated Muslim of color in this country.
(Originally published in HeraldNet on Jan. 31, 2021)
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Here are our ground rules:
- You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
- No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
- No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
- No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
- No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
- Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
- If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
- If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
- Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.