San Quentin State Prison’s most recent outbreak in mid-August reaffirmed the incarcerated community’s mistrust and reluctance to submit to COVID-19 testing.
Inside the prison, a positive COVID-19 test result triggers more than just fear of potential sickness or death. It also guarantees an abrupt 21-day relocation to solitary confinement in the prison’s infamous Adjustment Center (the AC).
Frank Wilbert Jr. said his nightmare began at 2 a.m. on August 14 when two corrections officers (COs) showed up at his cell door. “Get up and get dressed. You’re going to the AC,” he recalled them saying.
Two and a half days earlier, Wilbert and his cellmate were tested for COVID-19 after their building — South Block’s Alpine unit — was placed under quarantine following another resident’s positive test result. Nurses had made rounds that same afternoon, going from cell to cell in Alpine and urging everyone in the unit to test.
Wilbert didn’t hesitate. “I jumped off my bunk when the nurses showed up,” he said.
Nursing staff continued visiting Alpine day after day to administer temperature and oxygen level checks, but they never gave Wilbert any indication of his positive test result until that rude awakening by the COs.
He said officers told him and his cellie they could each take one box worth of property with them. “It was such a sudden and rushed move,” said Wilbert. “I was barely awake, so I hardly took any personal belongings.”
Without knowing exactly how long he’d be gone, Wilbert grabbed just his towel, shower shoes, toothpaste, soap and his small radio powered by a hand crank.
Officers escorted the two men from Alpine to the AC where a doctor greeted them.
“The doctor told us we were there because I’d tested positive,” said Wilbert. “My cellie tested negative, but they still moved him to the AC as a precaution.”
According to Wilbert, no one showed him his actual test results until almost a week later. “The paper they showed me wasn’t in any standard form,” he said. “My name wasn’t even on it, and where it said ‘collection date’ — that spot was just blank. I thought that was weird.”
During his time in the AC, Wilbert said he was permitted to shower every other day, and prisoners had to be handcuffed on the short walk from their cell to the shower stall. Wilbert said the AC staff offered him time in the outdoor recreational yard only twice during the entire 21-day stay. His only activities were listening to local news and reflecting on his isolation.
“After two weeks, I started questioning the whole situation and wondering how long they were going to keep me there,” he said. “It really was cruel and unusual punishment.”
Wilbert rarely saw any other incarcerated peers, mainly as they walked past his cell to shower and vice versa. “I had no idea what solitary was like before this. It was my first time in the AC.”
Wilbert had tested positive during SQ’s massive outbreak in July 2020 and had spent 30 days in the various quarantine tents set up on the baseball field. After that, Wilbert got his vaccination shots as soon as possible.
“I would not have done that if I were on the streets. But because of the environment in here, I felt an obligation to this community,” he said, adding that he has been taking precautions such as washing his hands frequently, wearing a mask and avoiding crowds.
Now that he has experienced living in the AC, he said he would refuse to take the test next time. “Now I understand why guys are refusing to take the test,” said Wilbert. “They’re actually punishing us for contracting COVID and it’s out of our control. There should be another area to house us — not the AC.”
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Here are our ground rules:
- You must credit Prison Journalism Project. In the byline, we prefer “[Author Name], Prison Journalism Project.” At the top of the text of your story, please include a line that says: “This story was originally published by Prison Journalism Project” and include a link to the article.
- No republishing of photographs, illustrations or graphics without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No editing the content, including the headline, except to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, changing, “today” to “last week,” or San Quentin to San Quentin, California. You can also make minor revisions for style or headline size, and you can trim stories for space. You must also retain all original hyperlinks, including links to the Prison Journalism Project newsletters.
- No translation of our stories into another language without specific permission. Please contact inquiries@prisonjournalismproject.org.
- No selling ads against our stories, but you can publish it on a page with ads that you’ve already sold.
- No reselling or syndicating our stories, including on platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. You also can’t republish our work automatically or all at once. Please select them individually.
- No scraping our website or using our stories to populate websites designed to improve search rankings or gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
- Any site our stories appear on must have a prominent and effective way to contact you.
- If we send you a request to remove our story, you must do so immediately.
- If you share republished stories on social media, please tag Prison Journalism Project. We have official accounts on Twitter (@prisonjourn), Facebook (@prisonjournalism), Instagram (@prisonjournalism) and Linked In.
- Let us know when you share the story. Send us a note, so we can keep track.